Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Brandon Holt Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Mar at 07:32 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ugo Carabelli vs B. Holt

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Carabelli 1 - 0 Holt
They have played 3 sets in total, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning 2 and Brandon Holt winning 1. The last match between Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Brandon Holt was at the Miami Open - Miami, 19-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 2-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Carabelli | 1 |
| Holt | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Miami Open - Miami(03-19-25)
C. U. Carabelli vs B. Holt H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $639,320 | Career Prize Money | $525,310 |
| 62.40% (380-229) | Career Total W/L | 60.27% (223-147) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 10 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 43.18% (19-25) | YTD Win/Loss | 11.11% (1-8) |
C. U. Carabelli vs B. Holt Match Preview:
In the thrilling world of tennis statistics, where numbers often play a game of Wimbledon themselves, we find Holt and Carabelli serving up a statistical showdown for the ages. With a second serve percentage more precise than a Swiss watchmaker, Holt has been winning 44.27% of those nerve-wracking points over the past six months. Carabelli, not to be outdone, lags slightly behind with 42.83%. In the realm of tennis fortune telling, this is a stat that often hits the sweet spot in predicting match outcomes.
Moving on to the realm of return game antics, Holt's been keeping opponents on their toes, stealing 44.3% of second serve points in his recent endeavors. Meanwhile, Carabelli has been doing his own grand theft racket with a 48.59% success rate. First serve returns are where the real magic happens, though, with Holt and Carabelli respectively claiming 27.01% and 30.13% of those oh-so-important points. Experts say if you know your return stats, you might just know who's the magician set to pull a rabbit out of a tennis hat.
When it comes to staring down breakpoints, Holt has thwarted his opponent's plans 52.45% of the time like a defiant statue in the face of a pigeon invasion. Carabelli, showing a slight edge, has cunningly saved 53.33% of breakpoints in recent performances. Throw this into your betting cauldron, and you might just brew a winning potion.
Yearly match results reveal both players walking a tightrope over victory valley, with Holt winning 62.5% of his matches and Carabelli notching slightly better at 63.95%. If playing on their favorite surface earned bonus points, Holt would be a shoe-in on the hard courts, winning 64% of his past matches there. Carabelli, meanwhile, would be slipping down the rankings on the grass but reigns supreme in the mud wrestling version of tennis on clay, proudly boasting a 65% win rate.
Delving into the levels of tournaments, Holt's mobility scooter has seen more action in the Challengers/ITF tournaments circles, snagging victories in 63.49% of matches. Carabelli walks into the same tournaments with a 75% win rate, proving that, for him, greatness comes in smaller packages. A look at their opponents shows Holt has danced around the court against players averaged at rank 270.36, while Carabelli's dance card includes slightly more formidable partners with an average rank of 222.77.
In the high-stakes world of deciding sets, if a match gets pushed to its limits, Holt boasts a 64% win rate, while Carabelli edges ahead with a fearless 68%. When it comes to collecting break points like stamps, Holt isn't shy, cashing in on 27.43% of opportunities, while Carabelli's got the numbers game down with a 34.92% conversion rate.
With all cards on the table, the statistical landscape tilts slightly in the favor of Carabelli. Statistically speaking, with his knack for returning serves, saving breakpoints, and strutting his stuff on clay, Carabelli is poised to triumph in this numerical carousel of a match.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Brandon Holt Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. U. Carabelli vs B. Holt H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 16 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:24:36 | Average Match Time | 2:24:36 |
| 65% (65/100) | 1st Serve % | 73% (72/98) |
| 66% (43/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (41/72) |
| 40% (14/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (17/26) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (6/12) |
| 41% (40/98) | Return Points Win % | 43% (43/100) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. U. Carabelli Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-7(5) 6-1 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 7-5 4-0 ret. | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
B. Holt Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 4-3 ret. | ||
QF | L | 6-0 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | ||

C. U. Carabelli vs B. Holt Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.40% (380/229) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.27% (223/147) |
| 59.23% (834/574) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.11% (505/364) |
| 53.58% (6986/6052) | Games Win/Loss | 53.18% (4384/3860) |
| 50.68% (37/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.75% (187/111) |
| 64.95% (341/184) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.44% (8/10) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.63% (20/18) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1144 | Aces Total | 1561 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1357 | Total Double Faults | 387 |
| 1:41:36 | Average Match Time | 1:36:20 |
| 372.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 401.74 |
| 62% (24524/39653) | 1st Serve % | 65% (15948/24566) |
| 66% (16262/24524) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (10913/15948) |
| 50% (7496/15128) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4406/8618) |
| 45% (2062/4586) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1064/2470) |
| 43% (17156/40178) | Return Points Win % | 40% (10082/25104) |
| 36.36% (8/14) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (10/10) |
| 41.67% (10/14) | Masters W/L | 30.77% (4/9) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Main Tour W/L | 46.88% (15/17) |
| 65.52% (190/100) | Challenger W/L | 55.31% (99/80) |
| 66.97% (146/72) | Futures W/L | 75.40% (95/31) |
| 63% (368/582) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (218/357) |
| 41% (7/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 53% (83/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (69/127) |
| 60% (109/183) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (66/122) |
| 89% (351/311) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (210/183) |
| 11% (351/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (210/26) |
| 26% (257/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (160/39) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Blockx H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
